Recall the Election Day exit polls that suggested John Kerry had won
a convincing victory? The media readily dismissed those polls and little
has been heard about them since.
Many Americans, however, were suspicious. Although President Bush
prevailed by 3 million votes in the official, tallied vote count, exit
polls had projected a margin of victory of 5 million votes for Kerry.
This unexplained 8 million vote discrepancy between the election night
exit polls and the official count should raise a Chinese May Day of red
flags.
The U.S. voting system is more vulnerable to manipulation than most
Americans realize. Technologies such as electronic voting machines
provide no confirmation that votes are counted as cast, and highly
partisan election officials have the power to suppress votes and
otherwise distort the count.
Exit polls are highly accurate. They remove most of the sources of
potential polling error by identifying actual voters and asking them
immediately afterward who they had voted for.
The reliability of exit polls is so generally accepted that the Bush
administration helped pay for them during recent elections in Georgia,
Belarus and Ukraine. Testifying before the House Committee on
International Relations Dec. 7, John Tefft, deputy assistant secretary
of state for European and Eurasian affairs, explained that the Bush
administration funded exit polls because they were one of the “ways that
would help to expose large-scale fraud.” Tefft pointed to the
discrepancy between exit polls and the official vote count to argue that
the Nov. 22 Ukraine election was stolen.
A comprehensive analysis of the Edison/Mitofsky report has been
posted
here
http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/1970/
As far as the average American is concerned, e-voting without a
paper back-up has two major drawbacks. For one thing, a voter cannot
verify whether his or her vote has been recorded accurately. For the
other, a recount becomes an exercise in futility when votes exist solely
in electronic memory.
The more tech-savvy American has another problem with e-voting:
skullduggery. He or she knows that electronic voting machines are just
not secure enough and that the outcome of a poll can be manipulated at
will.