Never say it cannot happen here... It already did.
• Special Comment:
Keith Olbermann addresses the signing of the Military Commission Act into
law in a special comment. 'Beginning of the end of America' -
"A government more dangerous to our liberty, than is the enemy it
claims to protect ..." www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
Hail King George... who "decidered" that
American citizens do not need free speech, the right to a fair
trial, habeas corpus protection, constitutional authority,
or a right to privacy. In fact, you may be rendered,
tortured, raped, or murdered... "legally."
~~~It is way past wakeup time.
"What is the Military Commissions Act?
Before delving into the effects of the passage of this law on the
functioning of the government, it is important to understand what the
law means for the average US citizen. To put it simply, The Military
Commissions Act subjects US citizens to the abuses that we were
promised we would not suffer under the USA PATRIOT Act. This is
accomplished by redefining an Unlawful Enemy Combatant as “a person who
has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents
who is not a lawful enemy combatant” (Military Commissions, sec. 948a).
It is extremely important that according to this definition, an Enemy
Combatant does not have to be someone engaged in hostilities.
When the USA PATRIOT Act was passed, civil rights organizations were
concerned about the fact that a person making a donation to a
charitable organization that the Bush government has decided may be an
enemy of the United States could be subject to investigation. Under the
Military Commissions Act, the same person could be secretly arrested
and sent to one of the many Guantanamo type military prison complexes
that the US is operating around the globe.
Of course the term “material support” is itself subjective. Such
support can be considered a vocal opinion against the crimes of the
Bush government. Earlier this year, the editors and staff of the New
York Times were under threat of being charged with espionage or treason
for publishing stories about the illegal wiretapping of all phones in
the US (Pincus). This is an example of journalistic writing being
considered material support.
The Military Commissions Act legalizes the secret detention facilities
and what occurs there. Acts of torture are no longer considered to be
torture. Military personnel (and other government agents) are now free
to torture prisoners. Retroactive immunity has been granted to all who
have already been involved with implementing policies of torture or
administering torture.
Further, the law authorizes secret military tribunals. In Hamdi v.
Rumsfeld and Hamden v. Rumsfeld, the Supreme Court ruled that secret
military tribunals were illegal and that all prisoners held by the US
were entitled to Habeas Corpus. (Habeas Corpus is the ability of a
prisoner to petition the courts, particularly the Supreme Court.)
Before this ruling, the Bush government had denied Habeas Corpus to
non-US citizens. Now with the redefinition of Unlawful Enemy Combatant,
Habeas Corpus is suspended for US citizens, as well.
What this means is that you can be secretly arrested and sent to a
prison camp in which you will be tortured to obtain evidence against
you. This evidence would then be used in a trial in a secret military
court where you can be sentenced to death. Nobody on the outside would
ever know. This is a policy of disappearing individuals that has been
used to suppress dissent against totalitarian dictatorships around the
world."
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=20061006053851806
Habeas corpus -- it's your most fundamental legal right, your right to
go to a court and get an order requiring the government to prove that
it is holding you in prison with proper legal authority to do so.
Without that right, one necessarily lives in a dictatorship. The
Constitution says it may never be suspended except in cases of
rebellion or invasion. President Bush today on October 17, 2006 signed
a bill repealing that law, meaning that the administration need not
comply or show compliance with law any more with regard to who goes to
prison or Gitmo.
While it supposedly applies just to terrorism cases, that doesn't
prevent it from ending the rule of law in the United States for our
newly all-powerful Executive. This is true not just because terrorism
is construed so broadly in the prohibition of "material support" for
terrorism (which by the way has already been held to include a lawyer's
press release on behalf of a terrorist client) but because the
administration NEED NOT PROVE IT'S REALLY TERRORISM because they don't
need to answer to any court in the land at any time.
Even "Justice" Scalia wrote in the Hamdan case that "the very core of
liberty secured by our Anglo-Saxon system of separated powers has been
freedom from indefinite imprisonment at the will of the Executive. "
That very core of liberty died on October 17, 2006 with the signing of
the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and its elimination of habeas
corpus.
The New Yorker: Fact
The most common destinations for rendered suspects are Egypt, Morocco,
Syria, ... (Bin al-Shibh is thought to have been tortured.) Government
attorneys have ...
www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?050214fa_fact6
"The spread of evil is the
symptom of a vacuum. whenever evil wins, it is only
by default: by the moral failure of those who evade
the fact that there can be no compromise on basic
principles."
Ayn Rand